<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Security Governance on Bill Brown:Thoughts and Reference Material Online</title><link>https://www.billbrown.info/tags/security-governance/</link><description>Recent content in Security Governance on Bill Brown:Thoughts and Reference Material Online</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>BillBrown.info</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.billbrown.info/tags/security-governance/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Applying ISA-CMM Process Areas to Capability Appraisals</title><link>https://www.billbrown.info/post/applying-isa-cmm-process-areas-to-capability-appraisals/</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.billbrown.info/post/applying-isa-cmm-process-areas-to-capability-appraisals/</guid><description>
&lt;h2 id="applying-isa-cmm-process-areas-to-capability-appraisals"&gt;Applying ISA-CMM Process Areas to Capability Appraisals&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A maturity model only produces a usable result if the appraisal method built around it is disciplined. ISSC662 coursework on the Information Security Assurance Capability Maturity Model (ISA-CMM) treats the appraisal itself as the object worth studying, not just the security controls the model eventually recommends. A source review can catalog what a maturity model measures. An appraisal has to decide how that measurement gets collected, checked, and reported back to the organization being assessed.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>